🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Expensive

Based on recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would require contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee earning moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast that with what average American pays. I can name multiple clients that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, these contributions include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding medical services. When you add those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both worker and company payments. Similar to much of federal defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, even with increased taxation required, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid current situation could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.